Reconstructing Curator Liability for Creditor Losses in Indonesian Bankruptcy Law
Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya
Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya
Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56943/jcj.v5i3.1034Article 72 of Indonesian Bankruptcy Law obliges a curator to compensate losses arising from fault or negligence in managing and settling bankrupt assets, yet the provision does not define how fault should be measured, how causation should be proven, or what defense a curator may raise, which leaves both creditors and curators exposed to inconsistent outcomes. Prior studies on curator accountability have examined this problem mainly through procedural or criminal law lenses, leaving the underlying structure of Article 72 itself largely unexamined. This study addresses that gap by reconstructing Article 72 through the theory of the purpose of law and the theory of responsibility. Using normative legal research, the study applies the statutory, conceptual, philosophical, and comparative approaches, drawing on Indonesian bankruptcy law, comparative insolvency practice in selected jurisdictions, and relevant legal theory. The findings show that Article 72 correctly adopts liability based on fault but lacks the normative detail needed to apply that principle consistently, including graduated standards of fault, defined causation, and a good faith defense. Comparative practice in the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, the United States, and Germany confirms that fault-based liability, refined through professional oversight, remains the dominant model. The study concludes that reconstruction should refine rather than replace the fault-based principle, strengthening proportionality, legal certainty, and balanced protection between creditors and curators within Indonesia's bankruptcy system.
Keywords: Bankrupt Assets Curator Liability Indonesian Bankruptcy Law Liability Based on Fault Theory of Responsibility
Alarifi, Fahad. “The Bankruptcy Law of Saudi Arabia: Policy, Operation and Comparison.” PSU Research Review 7, no. 3 (November 1, 2023): 201–17. https://doi.org/10.1108/PRR-02-2021-0011.
Alexy, Robert. “Gustav Radbruch’s Concept of Law.” In Law’s Ideal Dimension, 107–18. Oxford University Press, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198796831.003.0008.
Allan, T.R.S. “CONSTITUTIONALISM AT COMMON LAW: THE RULE OF LAW AND JUDICIAL REVIEW.” The Cambridge Law Journal 82, no. 2 (July 22, 2023): 236–64. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000819732300017X.
Amini, Nyak, Prof. Dr. Efik Yusdiansyah, and Dr. Dhody Ananta Rivandi. “LEGAL PROTECTION OF DISPUTED LAND DEED OFFICIALS IN THE BANKRUPTCY ESTATE BY THE CURATOR IN RELATION TO THE PRINCIPLE OF JUSTICE.” Journal of Court and Justice 3, no. 2 (June 14, 2024): 59–75. https://doi.org/10.56943/jcj.v3i2.544.
Andretsch, Florian. “Between Punishment and Protection: A Noble Insolvency and Its Governmental Management in Mid-Eighteenth-Century Lower Austria.” Continuity and Change 40, no. 2 (August 2025): 134–67. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0268416025100672.
Aprita, Serlika, Mona Wulandari, and Sarah Qosim. “Criminal Liability of the Curator for Illegal Acts in the Independence Principle.” Jurnal Cita Hukum 10, no. 2 (August 25, 2022): 391–404. https://doi.org/10.15408/jch.v10i2.27801.
Aristotle. The Nicomachean Ethics. Edited by Lesley Brown and David Ross. Oxford University Press, 2009.
Bovens, Mark. The Quest for Responsibility: Accountability and Citizenship in Complex Organisations. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
Dreier, Ralf. “Gustav Radbruchs Rechtsbegriff.” In Gesellschaft Und Gerechtigkeit, 15–45. Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co KG, 2011. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845231167-15.
Hart, H.L.A., and John Gardner. Punishment and Responsibility. Oxford University Press, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199534777.001.0001.
Keating, Gregory C. “Is There Really No Liability Without Fault: A Critique of Goldberg & Zipursky.” FORDHAM LAW REVIEW RES GESTAE, 2016.
Kelsen, Hans. General Theory of Law & State. Edited by Hans Kelsen and A. Javier Treviño. Routledge, 2017. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203790960.
Mengko, Allova Herling, Dudi Pramedi, and Adinda Annisa Madani. “Restructuring & Insolvency Laws and Regulations 2026.” International Comparative Legal Guides, May 29, 2026. https://iclg.com/practice-areas/restructuring-and-insolvency-laws-and-regulations/indonesia/.
Mulkan, Hasanal, and Serlika Aprita. “PERTANGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA KURATOR YANG MELAKUKAN PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM DALAM KAITANNYA DENGAN PRINSIP INDEPENDENSI BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 37 TAHUN 2004.” Unes Journal of Swara Justisia 7, no. 1 (2023): 264–76.
Niall, Keith K. Johannes von Kries: Principles of the Probability Calculus. Vol. 59. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36506-5.
Parisi, Francesco, and Giampaolo Frezza. “Burdens of Proof in Establishing Negligence: A Comparative Law and Economics Analysis.” Italian Law Journal 9 (2023).
Radbruch, G. “Five Minutes of Legal Philosophy (1945).” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 26, no. 1 (January 1, 2006): 13–15. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqi042.
———. “Statutory Lawlessness and Supra-Statutory Law (1946).” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 26, no. 1 (January 1, 2006): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqi041.
Republik Indonesia. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (Burgerlijk Wetboek) (n.d.).
Salmond, Sir John. Jurisprudence. Alpha Edition, 2019.
Stepanov, S. K. “Product Liability in Modern Conditions: European Reform Experience.” Digital Law Journal 4, no. 4 (August 8, 2024): 8–35. https://doi.org/10.38044/2686-9136-2023-4-4-2.
Suyanto, Dr. Suyanto. Metode Penelitian Hukum Pengantar Penelitian Normatif, Empiris Dan Gabungan. Gresik: Unigress Press, 2022.
Widyaningrum, Cokorda Istri Sri Dharma, and I Nyoman Bagiastra. “CORPORATE ORGANS’ ACCOUNTABILITY IN CASE OF SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP BANKRUPTCY.” Journal of Court and Justice 3, no. 3 (July 24, 2024): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.56943/jcj.v3i3.584.
