LEGAL FRAMEWORK AND CREDITOR RIGHTS IN BANKRUPTCY: ANALYZING PROPERTY COLLATERAL PROTECTION
Universitas Bhayangkara Surabaya
Universitas Bhayangkara Surabaya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56943/jmr.v3i1.636Bankruptcy is a legal process to settle the debts of debtors who are unable to pay their debts. In this process, the rights of creditors holding collateral may be affected. Uncertainty occurs because creditors do not control whether they can execute the collateral themselves or have to wait for the curator’s decision. In bankruptcy, property secured creditors face substantial risk of recovering their receivables. Property collateral, such as land and buildings, is often the main collateral to protect creditors' rights. However, complex insolvency procedures and lack of legal clarity often put creditors in a vulnerable position. This research analyzes the existing legal framework and how it protects the rights of secured creditors. Clearer and stronger protections are needed to create legal certainty and maintain financial system stability. This research uses a normative legal approach with statutory and conceptual methods. The results indicated that creditors holding collateral have the right to execute collateral through parate executie (direct execution), but are limited by the stay provisions in the Bankruptcy and PKPU Law. The curator can also execute the collateral with the approval of the supervisory judge and creditors. Both creditors and the curator can auction the collateral. In bankruptcy, creditors holding collateral have the priority right to execute the collateral. If the proceeds from the execution are not enough to pay off the debt, the creditor can submit the remaining bills as a concurrent creditor to the curator.
Keywords: Bankruptcy Collateral Objects in the Bank Separate Creditors
Asikin, Z. (2018). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Azzalea, G. D., Kusumadhani, J. A., Dacha, R. N. B., & Nelman, M. Z. (2021). Bentuk Tanggung Jawab Pemerintah dalam Permasalahan Kreditur Pemegang Hak Tanggungan Jika Pengajuan Pailit Ditolak oleh Pengadilan Niaga. Diponegoro Private Law Review, 8(1).
Disemadi, H. S., & Gomes, D. (2021). Perlindungan Hukum Kreditur Konkuren dalam Perspektif Hukum Kepailitan di Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Undiksha, 9(1).
Ginting, E. R. (2022). Hukum Kepailitan: Pengurusan dan Pemberesan Harta Pailit. PT Bumi Aksara.
Hindrawan, P., Sunarmi, Ginting, B., & Harianto, D. (2023). Tanggung Jawab Kurator dalam Menerapkan Asas Pari Passu Prorata Parte dalam Pengurusan dan Pemberesan Harta Pailit. Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review, 2(8).
HS, S. (2015). Hukum kontrak : perjanjian, pinjaman dan hibah (Cetakan 1). Sinar Grafika.
Irmayanti, A., Simanjuntak, K., & Naim, S. (2024). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Kreditur Akibat Berakhirnya Jangka Waktu Hak Guna Bangunan Yang Dibebani Hak Tanggungan. Judge: Jurnal Hukum, 5(2).
Is, M. S. (2016). Hukum Perusahaan di Indonesia. Kencana.
Kaliey, R. M., Umboh, K. Y., & Soewikromo, S. (2023). Kedudukan Benda Tak Bergerak sebagai Jaminan dalam Perjanjian Kredit. Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Unsrat Lex Privatum.
Kansil, C. (1996). Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perseroan Terbatas Tahun 1995. Pustaka Sinar Harapan.
Khisni, L. K., & Hanim, L. (2017). Implementasi Asas Droit de Preference terhadap Jaminan Hak Tanggungan oleh Pihak Perbankan dalam Perjanjian Kredit. Jurnal Akta, 4(1).
Marsidah. (2019). Bentuk Klausula-Klausula Baku dalam Perjanjian Kredit Bank. Jurnal Unpal, 17(3).
Menteri Negara Sekretaris Negara Republik Indonesia. (1998). Undang-undang Republik Indonesia nomor 10 Tahun 1998 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-undang nomor 7 Tahun 1992 tentang Perbankan.
Munah, F., & Deni, F. (2024). Perlindungan Hukum Istri Dalam Kepailitan Suami. Binamulia Hukum, 13(1), 277–288. https://doi.org/10.37893/jbh.v13i1.834
Nugroho, D. S. A. (2018). Hukum Kepailitan di Indonesia dalam Teori dan Praktik serta Penerapan Hukumnya. Prenadamedia Group.
Prof. Dr. Sutan, R. S. (2016). Sejarah, Asas, dan Teori Hukum Kepailitan (Memahami undang-undang No. 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran). Kencana.
Rasjidi, P. (Emeritus) D. H. L., & Rasjidi, L. S. (2019). Dasar-Dasar Filsafat dan Teori Hukum. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Saija, D. R. (2024). Perspektif Pailit dalam Perusahaan. Deepublish.
Saputra, I. E. (2020). Kedudukan Hukum Kreditor Preferen Pajak dan Kreditor Preferen Buruh dalam Proses Kepailitan. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 23(2), 155–166.
Siregar, N. R., & Putra, M. F. M. (2022). Tinjauan Hukum Kekuatan Eksekutorial Terhadap Permohonan Lelang Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan Atas Debitur Wanprestasi. Jurnal USM Law Review, 5(1).
Widjaja, V., & Soemartono, R. M. G. P. (2023). Implementasi UU Perlindungan Konsumen dan UU Kepailitan terhadap Konsumen Properti Pemegang PPJB. Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 8(10).
Wright, M. L. J. (2014). Interpreting the Pari Passu Clause in Sovereign Bond Contracts: It’s All Hebrew (and Aramaic) to Me. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2459921
