CSR and Corporate Sustainability: The Mediating Roles of Financial Performance and Legitimacy
Universitas Cenderawasih
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56943/joe.v5i2.1007Corporate social responsibility (CSR) has evolved from a philanthropic obligation into a strategic instrument through which firms pursue long-term sustainability. Despite growing scholarly interest, the mechanisms connecting CSR to sustainability outcomes remain insufficiently examined, particularly in developing economy contexts. This study investigates how CSR contributes to corporate sustainability through two parallel mediating pathways, financial performance and social legitimacy, drawing on legitimacy theory, stakeholder theory, and positive accounting theory as an integrated analytical framework. A systematic literature review of Scopus-indexed publications from 2021 to 2025 was conducted, with findings synthesised through classification, thematic analysis, and critical evaluation. The results confirm that CSR positively influences corporate sustainability, financial performance, and institutional legitimacy, supporting all three hypotheses proposed. These effects are conditional on implementation quality and the institutional environment in which firms operate. In emerging markets, including Indonesia, firms frequently adopt CSR in response to regulatory pressure rather than genuine strategic commitment, which constrains the financial and legitimacy gains that substantive engagement would otherwise generate. This study extends prior research by showing that financial performance and legitimacy function as simultaneous and mutually reinforcing mediators rather than independent channels, and it challenges the assumption that a positive CSR-sustainability relationship is universally applicable. The findings offer practical guidance for firms and policymakers in developing economies navigating rapidly expanding sustainable finance regulations.
Keywords: Corporate Social Responsibility Corporate Sustainability ESG Disclosure Legitimacy Stakeholder Theory
Aluchna, M., Roszkowska-Menkes, M., & Kamiński, B. (2023). From talk to action: the effects of the non-financial reporting directive on ESG performance. Meditari Accountancy Research, 31(7), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-12-2021-1530
Amah, O. E. (2022). Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). In Handbook of Research on Changing Dynamics in Responsible and Sustainable Business in the Post-COVID-19 Era (pp. 145–160). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-2523-7.ch007
Bolton, P., & Kacperczyk, M. (2021). Do investors care about carbon risk? Journal of Financial Economics, 142(2), 517–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.05.008
Broadstock, D. C., Chan, K., Cheng, L. T. W., & Wang, X. (2021). The role of ESG performance during times of financial crisis: Evidence from COVID-19 in China. Finance Research Letters, 38, 101716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101716
Carroll, A. B. (2021). Corporate Social Responsibility: Perspectives on the CSR Construct’s Development and Future. Business & Society, 60(6), 1258–1278. https://doi.org/10.1177/00076503211001765
Christensen, H. B., Hail, L., & Leuz, C. (2021). Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: economic analysis and literature review. Review of Accounting Studies, 26(3), 1176–1248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-021-09609-5
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (Sixth). SAGE Publication, Inc.
Dalimunthe, I. P., Gursida, H., & Indrayono, Y. (2025). CORPORATE GOVERNANCE DETERMINANTS OF BANK FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE THROUGH GREEN BANKING IN INDONESIA. Journal of Entrepreneurship, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.56943/joe.v4i2.768
Destri, A. M. L., Minà, A., & Picone, P. M. (2024). Corporate social irresponsibility and stakeholders’ support: evidence from a case study. Journal of Management and Governance, 28(1), 37–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-022-09639-4
Dumbrell, N. P., Adamson, D., Zuo, A., & Wheeler, S. A. (2021). How do natural resource dependent firms gain and lose a social licence? Global Environmental Change, 70, 102355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102355
Duque-Grisales, E., & Aguilera-Caracuel, J. (2021). Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Scores and Financial Performance of Multilatinas: Moderating Effects of Geographic International Diversification and Financial Slack. Journal of Business Ethics, 168(2), 315–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04177-w
Fatima, T., & Elbanna, S. (2023). Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Implementation: A Review and a Research Agenda Towards an Integrative Framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 183(1), 105–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05047-8
Forcadell, F. J., Lorena, A., & Aracil, E. (2023). The firm under the spotlight: How stakeholder scrutiny shapes corporate social responsibility and its influence on performance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(3), 1258–1272. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2417
Freeman, R. E. (2015). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. In Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139192675
Gillan, S. L., Koch, A., & Starks, L. T. (2021). Firms and social responsibility: A review of ESG and CSR research in corporate finance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 66, 101889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.101889
Lu, J., & Wang, J. (2021). Corporate governance, law, culture, environmental performance and CSR disclosure: A global perspective. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 70, 101264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2020.101264
Olateju, D. J., Olateju, O. A., Adeoye, S. V., & Ilyas, I. S. (2021). A critical review of the application of the legitimacy theory to corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Managerial Studies and Research, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.20431/2349-0349.0903001
Setiawati, S., Gursida, H., & Indrayono, Y. (2025). MSME Financial Literacy Model as A Measuring Tool for MSME Financial Performance. Journal of Entrepreneurship, 48–68. https://doi.org/10.56943/joe.v4i1.710
Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571. https://doi.org/10.2307/258788
Watts, R. L., & Zimmerman, J. L. (1978). Towards a Positive Theory of the Determination of Accounting Standards. The Accounting Review, 53(1), 112–134. https://doi.org/10.2308/TAR-4500569
