Smartboard Media and Learning Motivation in Elementary Mathematics: A Case Study in Rural Indonesia

Hanna Wahyu Aruming Tyas
Hanna Wahyu Aruming Tyas: Universitas Terbuka

Abstract

Conventional mathematics instruction in elementary schools has been associated with low student motivation, particularly among learners in the concrete operational stage of cognitive development. This study examined the role of interactive digital smartboard media in fostering learning motivation among fourth-grade students in mathematics at a rural elementary school in South Lampung Regency, Indonesia. A descriptive qualitative approach with a single embedded case study design was employed, involving 24 students purposively selected on the basis of preliminary evidence of low motivational engagement. Data were collected across three structured learning sessions through participatory observation, semi-structured interviews, a motivation questionnaire, and systematic field notes, and were analyzed using the interactive model of Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña, with trustworthiness established through source and technique triangulation. Results showed a progressive increase in active engagement from 40% during conventional instruction to 85% and 92% across the two smartboard-assisted sessions, with a mean motivation score of 83.4%. Qualitative data indicated heightened curiosity, reduced reluctance, and spontaneous peer collaboration during smartboard-assisted lessons, though a small proportion of students remained less engaged. Given the purposive sampling and limited session count, these findings should be interpreted as context-specific rather than generalizable. The study nonetheless offers preliminary evidence that interactive smartboard media can stimulate learning motivation in elementary mathematics, with implications for instructional design and directions for future research using larger, unselected samples.

References

[1] Alam, A., & Mohanty, A. (2023). Cultural beliefs and equity in educational institutions: exploring the social and philosophical notions of ability groupings in teaching and learning of mathematics. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 28(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2023.2270662
[2] Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Worth Publishers.
[3] Bednorz, D., & Bruhn, S. (2023). Influence of primary students’ self-regulated learning profiles on their rating of a technology-enhanced learning environment for mathematics. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1074371
[4] Carstens, K. J., Mallon, J. M., Bataineh, M., & Al-Bataineh, A. (2021). Effects of Technology on Student Learning. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 20(1).
[5] Chen, X., Twomey, K. E., & Westermann, G. (2021). Curiosity Enhances Incidental Object Encoding in 8-month-old Infants. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/6bwfm
[6] Chukwuedo, S. O., Mbagwu, F. O., & Ogbuanya, T. C. (2021). Motivating academic engagement and lifelong learning among vocational and adult education students via self-direction in learning. Learning and Motivation, 74, 101729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2021.101729
[7] Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2024). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/qualitative-inquiry-and-research-design/book266033#main-content
[8] Cvencek, D., Brečić, R., Gaćeša, D., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2021). Development of Math Attitudes and Math Self-Concepts: Gender Differences, Implicit–Explicit Dissociations, and Relations to Math Achievement. Child Development, 92(5), e940–e956. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13523
[9] Dabbagh, N. (2023). The Pedagogical Ecology of Learning Technologies: A Learning Design Framework for Meaningful Online Learning. In Higher Education in the Arab World (pp. 25–51). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-33568-6_3
[10] Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7
[11] Golaszewski, N., Bartholomew, J., Errisuriz, V., Korinek, E., & Jowers, E. (2021). Predictors of on-task Behaviors: Evaluating Student-level Characteristics. Health Behavior and Policy Review, 8(2), 159–167. https://doi.org/10.14485/HBPR.8.2.6
[12] Hanin, V., & Gay, P. (2023). Comparative analysis of students’ emotional and motivational profiles in mathematics in grades 1–6. Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1117676
[13] Hidayat, A., Setyaningsih, P. D. S., & Wulandari, D. D. (2024). Improving Job Performance By Strengthening Work Motivation, Organizational Climate, Transformational Leadership, and Growth Mindset. SUJANA (Education and Learning Review), 35–49. https://doi.org/10.56943/sujana.v3i1.496
[14] Kühl, T., & Wohninsland, P. (2022). Learning with the interactive whiteboard in the classroom: Its impact on vocabulary acquisition, motivation and the role of foreign language anxiety. Education and Information Technologies, 27(7), 10387–10404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11004-9
[15] Larkin, K., & Lowrie, T. (2022). STEM Education in the Early Years. Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2810-9
[16] Mayer, R. E. (2020). Multimedia Learning. In Multimedia Learning. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316941355
[17] McCarthy, A. M., Maor, D., McConney, A., & Cavanaugh, C. (2023). Digital transformation in education: Critical components for leaders of system change. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 8(1), 100479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100479
[18] Miles, M. B., Huberman, M. A., & Saldana, J. (2020). Qualitative Data Analysis : A Methods Sourcebook. SAGE.
[19] Paradise, D. R., & Prak, D. P. (2024). IMPACT OF LEADERSHIP IN CAMBODIAN HIGHER EDUCATION THROUGH DIGITALIZATION. SUJANA (Education and Learning Review), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.56943/sujana.v3i2.569
[20] Piaget, J. (1952). The Origins of Intelligence in Children. In When Thinking . International University Press. https://www.bxscience.edu/ourpages/auto/2014/11/16/50007779/Piaget When Thinking Begins10272012_0000.pdf
[21] Rahimi, R. A., & Oh, G. S. (2024). Rethinking the role of educators in the 21st century: navigating globalization, technology, and pandemics. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 12(2), 182–197. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-024-00303-4
[22] Ramos, M., De Sixte, R., Jáñez, Á., & Rosales, J. (2022). Academic motivation at early ages: Spanish validation of the Elementary School Motivation Scale (ESMS-E). Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.980434
[23] Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
[24] Saccardo, F., Decarli, G., Missagia, V. I., Andrao, M., Gini, F., Zancanaro, M., & Franchin, L. (2024). Emotions and interactive tangible tools for math achievement in primary schools. Frontiers in Psychology, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1440981
[25] Siller, H.-S., & Ahmad, S. (2024). The Effect of Concrete and Virtual Manipulative Blended Instruction on Mathematical Achievement for Elementary School Students. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 24(2), 229–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-024-00336-y
[26] Sugiyono. (2022). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif: (Untuk penenelitian yang bersifat: eksploratif, enterpretif, interaktif dan konstruktif). Bandung : Penerbit Alfabeta.
[27] Vansteenkiste, M., Ryan, R. M., & Soenens, B. (2020). Basic psychological need theory: Advancements, critical themes, and future directions. Motivation and Emotion, 44(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-019-09818-1
[28] Vasconcellos, D., Parker, P. D., Hilland, T., Cinelli, R., Owen, K. B., Kapsal, N., Lee, J., Antczak, D., Ntoumanis, N., Ryan, R. M., & Lonsdale, C. (2020). Self-determination theory applied to physical education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(7), 1444–1469. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000420
[29] Wahyuni, N. T., Mulyanah, A., Winahyu, S. K., Darmawati, B., Widiastuti, R., Sariah, Parwati, S. A. P. E., Ratnawati, Izzak, A., & Nurhuda, P. (2025). Leveraging Situational Interest to Enhance Motivation and Engagement in Indonesian Primary EFL Classrooms. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 15(6), 1975–1986. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1506.26
[30] Wang, C., Chen, X., Yu, T., Liu, Y., & Jing, Y. (2024). Education reform and change driven by digital technology: a bibliometric study from a global perspective. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 256. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02717-y
[31] Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (Sixth Edition). SAGE Publishing.
[32] Zhou, Y., Li, X., & Wijaya, T. T. (2022). Determinants of Behavioral Intention and Use of Interactive Whiteboard by K-12 Teachers in Remote and Rural Areas. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.934423